Part 6: Agency self-monitoring

What Part 6 of the NCS Regulations requires

Part 6 of the NCS Regulations
(National Care Standards and Related Matters) Regulations 2018 View the full glossary
states that organisations with care and custody of tamariki
Children (plural) aged 0-13 yearsView the full glossary
and rangatahi
Young person aged 14 – 21 years of ageView the full glossary
must monitor their own compliance with the regulations. They must have systems in place to identify and address areas of practice that require improvement.

It is only through self-monitoring that organisations like Oranga Tamariki can be assured that a good standard of care is being provided. Robust self-monitoring means that good practice and areas for improvement can be identified and acted on.

As the independent monitor, we rely on administrative data from Oranga Tamariki and other monitored agencies. For the 2024/25 reporting period, changes in Oranga Tamariki data infrastructure and personnel mean that we have received recalculated data from previous years. Some figures – such as for reports of concern – are very different from those previously provided and cause us to question the accuracy of monitoring and reporting within the agency.

This year, Oranga Tamariki again reports that it is partially compliant with the NCS Regulations
(National Care Standards and Related Matters) Regulations 2018 View the full glossary
.170 It states that 37 percent of tamariki
Children (plural) aged 0-13 yearsView the full glossary
and rangatahi
Young person aged 14 – 21 years of ageView the full glossary
in its care were estimated to have had its own core lead indicators met. The core lead indicators are a subset of the 21 lead indicators. This level of compliance is the same as the previous year.

There has been no change to the Oranga Tamariki lead indicator framework

Oranga Tamariki introduced its lead indicator framework ahead of our 2022/23 Experiences of Care in Aotearoa
New ZealandView the full glossary
report. Oranga Tamariki uses the framework to monitor its own compliance with the NCS Regulations
(National Care Standards and Related Matters) Regulations 2018 View the full glossary
and publishes annual reports on this. 171

There has been no change to the lead indicator framework for the 2024/25 reporting period. However, Oranga Tamariki advised that lead indicator 16, which looks at whether tamariki
Children (plural) aged 0-13 yearsView the full glossary
and rangatahi
Young person aged 14 – 21 years of ageView the full glossary
are placed with an approved caregiver, is based on a smaller sample of files that makes it more susceptible to year-on-year variations and harder to track changes over time. It said this lead indicator should be interpreted with caution and acknowledges that there is an issue with the ongoing inclusion of this lead indicator in its selfmonitoring approach. Oranga Tamariki has said it will reconsider the lead indicators ahead of next year’s reporting.

Oranga Tamariki case file analysis has improved

Oranga Tamariki self-monitoring includes analysis of the case files of a sample of tamariki
Children (plural) aged 0-13 yearsView the full glossary
and rangatahi
Young person aged 14 – 21 years of ageView the full glossary
in care. For the 2024/25 reporting period, case file analysis questions covered some new areas or areas where Oranga Tamariki had previously relied on its Quality Practice Tool (QPT).172

The new case file analysis questions cover:

  • reasons for care entry
  • reasons for transitions between placements
  • mental health diagnoses and support
  • transitions to adulthood (including life skills assessments and transition planning)
  • data quality for recording social worker visits
  • supervision for social workers
  • Oranga Tamariki practice standards.

Oranga Tamariki has also stated its intention to discontinue case file analysis that assesses planning for tamariki and rangatahi to move out of care and into permanent arrangements. Issues around recording these plans and decisions in CYRAS, together with the dynamic nature of tamariki and rangatahi plans, meant the data was not truly representative and was potentially misleading.173 Oranga Tamariki has since advised that case file analysis does still ask a question about whether permanency planning is on track. Oranga Tamariki told us this offers a more reliable picture of whether planning is on track.

Oranga Tamariki surveys that would have helped us understand the perspectives of tamariki, rangatahi and kaimahi have been delayed

Surveys are a valuable tool for gathering first-hand perspectives from people on a wide range of issues. In 2024/25, Oranga Tamariki conducted its annual caregiver survey, which is referred to throughout this report.174

The 2024/25 Oranga Tamariki annual report states that Oranga Tamariki has also conducted fieldwork on its third Te Toho o te Ora child survey and has piloted a new whānau
Whānau refers to people who are biologically linked or share whakapapa. For the Monitor’s monitoring purposes, whānau includes parents, whānau members living with tamariki at the point they have come into care View the full glossary
survey. It has also introduced a new survey of partners and providers. We have yet to see the survey results.

We understand that the next iteration of Te Pihinga, a kaimahi survey on cultural capability, is planned for 2025/26.

Changes in Oranga Tamariki personnel have resulted in some major discrepancies in the data

Oranga Tamariki introduced a new enterprise data analytics platform in 2024/25 to replace its legacy data warehouse. This also required the replacement of legacy computer code used for reporting. The implementation of this major change to data collection appears to have been affected by capacity constraints and the loss of expertise and institutional knowledge during recent restructures.

As part of the restructure, the Safety of Children in Care team was disestablished and some of its functions were transferred to a role within the Quality Practice Improvement team. Consequently, some data that was previously supplied is no longer available. One example is data on the proportion of the reports of concern for tamariki
Children (plural) aged 0-13 yearsView the full glossary
and rangatahi
Young person aged 14 – 21 years of ageView the full glossary
in care that were considered to be allegations of abuse or neglect. Oranga Tamariki has since advised that, in 2026, it will begin case file analysis on reports of concern for tamariki and rangatahi in care that ended with no further action in the initial assessment phase.

Together with the re-platforming of the data warehouse, this means there are several areas where data is not available or where there are discrepancies between data that was provided previously and data provided this year for the same periods.

This raises concerns about the quality of the data we are receiving from Oranga Tamariki to assess compliance. More importantly, Oranga Tamariki should be concerned about the impact of poorquality data on its ability to assure itself it is working well.

Information sharing with other agencies is slower than planned

We have reported for several years, and agencies have told us, that poor information sharing is a barrier to compliance with the NCS Regulations
(National Care Standards and Related Matters) Regulations 2018 View the full glossary
. This is both in terms of agencies’ ability to meet tamariki
Children (plural) aged 0-13 yearsView the full glossary
and rangatahi
Young person aged 14 – 21 years of ageView the full glossary
needs and in terms of monitoring whether needs are met. This year, a measure from Ngā Wawata performance framework175 found that just 4 percent of Oranga Tamariki partners and providers felt strongly that Oranga Tamariki provided the critical information they needed to perform their role.

As an example of the inability to accurately monitor compliance, in 2023, Oranga Tamariki conducted a data match with Health NZ to determine immunisation rates and PHO enrolment rates for tamariki and rangatahi in care. This revealed that Oranga Tamariki was substantially under-recording PHO enrolment – while the data match showed 93 percent of tamariki and rangatahi were enrolled, Oranga Tamariki data showed an enrolment rate of just 56 percent.

In its response to our data request for 2024/25, Oranga Tamariki told us it is continuing to work with the Ministry of Health to obtain health-related data (such as PHO enrolments and immunisation rates) for tamariki and rangatahi in care.

For education, we have previously reported that poor information sharing is a barrier to ensuring tamariki and rangatahi are enrolled at a registered school (or other formal education). We heard that Oranga Tamariki and the Ministry of Education were actioning an information-sharing agreement, with an initial focus on enrolments and attendance, beginning in February 2025. We now understand that this did not occur during the 2024/25 reporting period, and the first sharing of information took place in November 2025. This is discussed in detail in Part 2 of this report.

170 “This year, during a period of significant change for Oranga Tamariki, most of those improvements [from previous years] have again been maintained. However, we have yet to see the gains needed to improve our overall assessment of compliance.” See (p. 115) of reference at footnote 34.
171 The compliance report for 2023/24 was published as part of the Oranga Tamariki annual report – see footnote 33. The compliance report for 2022/23 was published separately: Oranga Tamariki. (2024). Compliance report against National Care Standards Regulations: 2022/23 financial year. ot.govt.nz/assets/Uploads/About-us/Performance-and-monitoring/Independent-Childrens- Monitor/Compliance-Report-against-National-Care-Standards-Regulations-2.pdf
172 The use of QPT in NCS Regulations
(National Care Standards and Related Matters) Regulations 2018 View the full glossary
compliance self-monitoring is now restricted to one area (quality of the caregiver assessment process). This is a positive step. Although QPT is useful for operational quality monitoring, it is not suitable for NCS Regulations compliance self-monitoring.
173 “We are unable to answer these questions as the data for permanency questions has been found at times to misrepresent the current permanency goal and status of any given case. This is due in part to CYRAS recording issues and the dynamic nature of tamariki
Children (plural) aged 0-13 yearsView the full glossary
plans (often requiring changes to the permanency goal). Therefore, the data is not representative and has therefore not been shared. We also intend to remove these questions from future case file analysis.” Oranga Tamariki response to Aroturuki Tamariki combined data request for 2024/25, Part 3. Quantitative measures (p. 28).
174 In 2024/25, the Oranga Tamariki caregiver survey was run in-house and sent only by email rather than by email and phone calls as in previous years. Questions were also not the same as previous years, so comparisons to the previous survey have only been made where they are appropriate and possible.
175 Measure: Partners and providers experience genuine partnership.